Skip to content

Blog

Crypto Exchange User Acquisition Beyond Affiliates

Crypto exchange user acquisition still runs mostly on affiliates paid a share of trading fees, with paid search limited to certified, licensed exchanges; OKX's default affiliate commission, for example, is 30% of invitees' trading fees, per its affiliate rules. The question for a growth lead isn't which channel exists. It's what each one pays for, when, and how much of it buys people who never trade.

The guides that rank for this topic list channels. This one compares them on the terms a trading venue or prop firm actually budgets in: the unit you pay for, the moment you pay, and where the spend leaks. It ends with a channel most venues haven't priced yet: cashback on card spend, paid in your own credit and only when it's claimed.

The main acquisition channels, compared

Channel What you pay for When you pay Where it leaks
Affiliates on a fee share A share of the referred trader's fees As they trade, for as long as the terms say Traffic quality you can't see; self-referral and incentivised sign-ups
Affiliates on cost per acquisition (CPA) A qualified sign-up or first deposit At qualification Accounts that hit the qualifying action and stop
Paid search and social Clicks or impressions Up front Certification and licensing gates; restricted countries; weak attribution
Crypto ad networks and key opinion leaders (KOLs) Placements or posts Up front Reach without intent; hard to tie to funded accounts
Deposit bonuses and trading vouchers Credit on your own venue When the bonus is used Mostly reaches people you already acquired; bonus farming
Cashback on card spend Your credit, to a card spender who claims it Only on claim Cardholders who never claim cost nothing; the risk is paying claimers who never trade

Affiliates dominate for a reason: they're paid on outcomes. On OKX's published rules, commission is "a portion of their trading fees," reviewed monthly by invitees' volume and count, and "not permanent." That's a fair structure. Its weakness is that the venue sees the trader only after the affiliate has already shaped who arrives.

Paid search for crypto exchanges: allowed, with gates

Google allows ads for crypto exchanges and wallets, but its cryptocurrencies policy lists exchanges and wallets among the businesses that must be certified, and advertisers must follow the rules of every location they target. In the EU, exchange and wallet ads need authorisation as a crypto-asset service provider under MiCA. Its October 2026 update, for example, lets UAE-targeted exchange ads run from October 21, 2026 if the advertiser holds a licence from the CMA, DFSA, FSRA or VARA and is certified with Google.

In practice that means paid search scales country by country, as your licences do. For a venue licensed in a handful of markets, search is a strong channel in those markets and closed everywhere else.

How prop firms acquire traders

Prop firms face the same problem with a different product. They sell evaluation challenges, and most of them lean on affiliates for the same reason exchanges do.

FTMO's published programme is a good reference. It pays a one-time commission on each referred trader's first purchase of each CFD product, from 8% at Bronze to 20% at Platinum, and futures commissions for up to 12 months per trader (FTMO affiliate programme).

Paid search is harder still. Google treats contracts for difference, spread betting and rolling spot forex as complex speculative financial products, allowed only for licensed providers in listed countries, and it disapproves destinations that offer trading signals or affiliate broker reviews. A prop firm should check whether its ads fall under that policy before it budgets for search.

Where affiliate spend leaks

Affiliate fraud is real but hard to size, and most estimates come from vendors who sell detection. The most cited figure comes from CHEQ, which estimated in a study announced via PR Newswire that the industry would lose over $3.4 billion to affiliate fraud in 2022, with 17% of affiliate traffic fake. Treat that as a direction, not a benchmark for your venue.

The more common leak isn't fraud at all. It's paying a CPA for an account that deposits once and never trades, or a fee share to an affiliate whose audience was going to sign up anyway. Both are invisible until months later in cohort data.

Paying in your own credit instead of cash

A venue's own credit costs it less than its face value, as long as it can only be used on the venue. That's the logic behind deposit bonuses and trading vouchers, and it carries over to any channel that pays in credit:

  • Trading venue: fee credit or margin used by a trader who wasn't trading with you costs forgone fees, and generates volume and funding activity.
  • Prop firm: credit toward a challenge costs the marginal cost of a challenge, which is mostly the payout liability on the share of traders who pass.
  • Casino: credit with a turnover requirement must be played through before withdrawal, so part of it returns as house edge.

The catch is turnover. Credit that can be withdrawn straight away is cash, and it gets farmed like cash (we cover the controls in bonus abuse prevention). The venue should set how much of the credit must be traded or used before anything can leave.

Card spenders as an acquisition channel

There's a group of people every crypto venue wants and few reach directly: people who spend from a crypto card every day. They hold crypto, a Card program has already onboarded them, and they move money regularly.

Card programs want to give them cashback, and most pay for it themselves out of thin interchange (see how crypto card cashback is funded and crypto card cashback rates compared). Cashback funded by a venue changes the arrangement. The cardholder earns the venue's cashback on every settled card spend and can only claim it into an account on that venue. The venue pays nothing until the claim, and pays in its own credit.

Compared with affiliates, this channel has a clear weakness: cardholders aren't looking for a venue when they spend. They're passive until they see a balance. Its strength is in the payment terms. You never pay for a click, a sign-up or a cardholder who doesn't claim.

Where Fanback fits

Fanback is the network that runs this channel. Platforms fund cashback on crypto Card programs, and the Platform terms are set out on the site:

  • Paid on claim. You pay only when a cardholder claims, and only into an account on your Platform. Unclaimed cashback expires at 90 days and costs nothing.
  • Your terms. You set the cashback rate, your restricted countries and turnover before withdrawal. As an example, a 1% rate on $500 of spend is $5.00 of your credit.
  • Checked before you pay. Settled spend only, terms accepted, restricted countries refused at claim, a blacklist checked at claim and again before export, and an account you confirm. If the account isn't found, nothing is paid until the cardholder fixes it.
  • Your rail. Claims arrive as a CSV export or a signed webhook, each with an account ID, a Card program, an amount and a status.

Monthly budgets and per-cardholder caps are shown on the page as coming, not live. Ask about them on a call.

Frequently asked questions

How do crypto exchange affiliate programs pay?

Most pay a share of the referred trader's fees. OKX's default commission is 30% of invitees' trading fees, reviewed monthly by volume and number of traded invitees, and its rules say the relationship is not permanent and does not guarantee lifetime commission.

Can crypto exchanges advertise on Google?

Yes, with certification and local licensing. Google's policy lists exchanges and wallets among the crypto businesses that must be certified, and each targeted country has its own licence test, such as MiCA authorisation in the EU. From October 21, 2026, for example, UAE-targeted exchange ads need a CMA, DFSA, FSRA or VARA licence plus Google certification.

How do prop firms get new traders?

Mostly through affiliates and their own communities. FTMO pays affiliates a one-time 8% to 20% commission on a referred trader's first purchase of each CFD product, depending on partner level. Paid search is limited because Google restricts CFD and forex advertising to licensed providers in listed countries.

What is the difference between a deposit bonus and cashback?

A deposit bonus is credit given to someone who has already deposited, so it mostly reaches people you've already acquired. Cashback on card spend is earned before the person is your customer, and it becomes your cost only if they claim it into an account on your venue.

How do you measure acquisition from card cashback?

Every claim carries a username on your venue, so you can tie it to that account's later deposits, trades or challenge purchases in your own data. Measure cost per active account, not cost per claim, because a claim is a first step, not the outcome.

The bottom line

Affiliates will stay the backbone of crypto exchange and prop firm acquisition, because they're paid on outcomes. Their blind spot is who they send. A channel paid in your own credit, only on claim, into an account you can check, has a different blind spot: people who claim and never come back. Turnover and claim checks are what close it.

If your acquisition budget is already paying for credit in bonuses and vouchers, aiming some of it at card spenders before they're your customers is a cheap test. Talk to us about Platform terms.

Sources